食品企业经济利益驱动型掺假动机和原因分析

基金项目:

中国检科院院属基金项目“利益驱动型食品安全风险形成机理和控制措施研究(2014JK035)”；

详细信息

Analysis of motivation and reason for Economically Motivated Adulteration in food company

摘要: 作为一种可能带来食品安全风险的行为,经济利益驱动型掺假（EMA）已经给消费者造成了巨大的健康和经济损失,本文通过成本-收益分析方法,对非法和合法食品企业选择EMA行为的动机和原因进行了分析,结果表明,非法和合法食品企业选择EMA行为的动机和原因存在明显差异。因此,EMA防控时对两类企业要采用不同的防控模式和机制。
- 食品 /
- 掺假 /
- 成本 /
- 动机
Abstract: As a behavior that might lead to food safety risk,Economically Motivated Adulteration( EMA) have caused great health and economic losses to consumer.In this study,the motivation and reason analysis of legal and illegal food company with EMA were researched by cost- profit method. Results showed that there was significant difference in motivation and reason of legal and illegal food company with EMA,therefore,legal and illegal food company with EMA should be prevented by different control mechanism and model.
- food /
- adulteration /
- cost /
- motivation

[1]	Department of Health and Human Services Food and Drug Administration,Report on FDA’s Approach to Medical Product Supply Chain Safety[R].2009.
[2]	周济南.浅谈假冒伪劣产品的成因、危害与治理对策[J].现代商业,2014,(6):18.
[3]	刘占武.柠檬市场与不完全逆向选择-一个关于假冒伪劣顽症的分析框架[D].北京:首都经济贸易大学,2006.
[4]	栾贵勤,黄静跃.对假冒伪劣现象的经济学分析[J].企业经济,2011,(4):146-148.
[5]	沃健.企业会计造假成本收益分析及机制约束[J].浙江社会科学,2002,(4):182-186.
[6]	费太安.假冒伪劣现象的经济学分析[D].合肥:安徽大学,2006.
[7]	王丽颖,何莉.非对称信息条件下假冒伪劣现象的发生机制[J].长春大学学报,2005,15(1):42-45.
[8]	谢庆红.中国假冒伪劣商品成因及治理研究[D].成都:西南财经大学,2009.
[9]	袁少锋,高英.企业产品造假行为的不完全信息博弈分析[J].科技与管理,2009(11):106-108.
[10]	刘成果.中国奶业年鉴(2008)[M].北京:中国农业出版社,2008.
[11]	李晶.奶业产业化经营中利益分配机制比较研究[D].包头:内蒙古师范大学,2007.
[12]	车爽爽.我国乳制品质量安全制度下奶农经济利益保障研究[D].武汉:武汉工业学院,2012.